Stage-Gate and software don’t mix

I recently read this interesting article from Nielsen Wire on new product development for consumer packaged goods (CPG).  This article talks about how to realize the most revenue from new product development in the CPG space. Key takeaways:

  • Manage ideas loosely (have an innovation team live far, far away from headquarters with low involvement from senior staff)
  • Manage the process precisely (a formal Stage-Gate process is recommended)

I found myself scratching my head over how to translate these astounding insights to high tech new product development in a software startup or small business environment.  My take: they don’t translate.

I agree in principle with managing ideas loosely – no blue sky work can occur if every new idea is shot down by someone who is too concerned with the here and now.  But is it prudent to have a completely separate blue sky process in a startup when the entire startup needs to all march to the same tune?  This structure seems advisable only for corporations with a strong established business, which generates the revenue to fund the innovation process.  For pre-revenue or early revenue-bearing businesses, there is no separation between new product development and the business itself – they are one and the same.  A company like that hasn’t earned the right to send a team off to another city and go blue-sky on everybody else.

The second point made in the article, regarding tight management of process, is even less transferable.    Let’s take the application of Stage-Gate for an example.  Imagine managing web software development with a 2 week release cycle, where each release must go through the 5 typical gates:

  • Gate 1: initial screen (to decide whether the idea is worth pursuing)
  • Gate 2: approval to proceed to building a business case
  • Gate 3: approval to proceed to development
  • Gate 4: review outcome of development before going into QA
  • Gate 5: review outcome of QA, decide whether to release

“Absurd” is the only word that comes to mind.

I believe in only as much process as it takes to maximize efficiency and guarantee a high quality of output. (That is a whole lot more process than most entrepreneurs I work with are used to.  I can’t help it – if I am to execute I have to set up an efficient environment.)  I also believe in tailoring processes to suit the industry and nature of programs.  Different processes are established for different things.  You can’t apply a consumer electronics hardware development process naively to shrinkwrap software development, and you cannot apply shrinkwrap software development processes naively to web application development.

Stage-Gate can work for CPG and hardware development programs with a long turnaround time, but is completely inappropriate for fast turnaround programs and most software programs.   It behooves senior management to understand enough of the principles of Stage-Gate versus Agile or Mini-Waterfall so they can apply an appropriate level of oversight without bogging everybody down with inapplicable processes.

About these ads

4 Responses to “Stage-Gate and software don’t mix”


  1. 1 Tim Washington July 1, 2011 at 1:38 pm

    I think you’re right, Stage-Gate wouldn’t work well for two-week development cycles, and neither was it developed to work in that kind of environment. “Right-sizing” the process is critical for making an organization run smoothly. Stage-Gate was intended for larger projects, not just NPD. Larger companies with big IT projects can still benefit from Stage-Gate because it blends business criteria (which is needed) with technical criteria (also needed).

  2. 2 mirena recall May 2, 2013 at 5:38 pm

    I for all time emailed this blog post page to all my contacts,
    because if like to read it then my contacts will too.

  3. 3 Jon May 6, 2013 at 1:35 am

    With the time spent in online game communities
    and multiplayer games, players get the opportunity to
    make new relationships and strengthen the existing ones.

    True, but that does not make the games not less fun, or not less based on the movies.
    Everyone with plenty of cash to commit could be a winner at Small Hand Texas
    Holdem Poker soon after obtaining familiarized with
    a handful of primary dos and don’ts.

  4. 4 www.malan.com.cn May 7, 2013 at 12:51 pm

    Upon examining some etymological dictionaries, one can conclude that games
    are a creative expression of the human spirit through the creation of an activity that has an entertaining, instructive
    and competing element. Then came the ultra-popular Arkham games, that place you, like never before, into Batman’s shoes as he skulks around and knocks hoodlums heads together (literaly). It is recommended that the golfers select those putters with which the golfers feel good and works well with their gaming pattern.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




About Elaine Chen

Elaine Chen

Elaine is a seasoned product development executive with 20 years of experience bringing products to market in a startup setting. Click here to view her full profile.

Twitter Updates


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 485 other followers

%d bloggers like this: