Archive for the 'mobile' Category

On brand loyalty and the iPad 2

iPad 2 versus Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1
[tweetmeme source=”chenelaine” only_single=”false” service=”bit.ly”]

I have mixed feelings about mobile products from Apple.  On the one hand, they are gorgeous.  The hardware is well designed and manufactured, the software interface is fabulous, and the user experience simply delights.  On the other hand, they are made by Apple, and I have a serious problem with their business practices.  

Apple’s closed ecosystem completely turns me off.   But it’s the experience of doing business with Apple on behalf of a previous employer that has permanently soured my ability to truly enjoy Apple products.  To this day I cannot look at an iPhone or an iPad and not get flashbacks.

This is why I carry an AT&T Samsung Captivate running Android 2.2 (Froyo), and conduct all my business using Google apps on my phone.  Samsung and Google are two brands that I dig.  I find Samsung to be almost as good as Apple in hardware product design.  Their mobile business unit is highly innovative and the Galaxy and Galaxy II lines are fantastic.  The cosmetics, fit and finish of their phones are impeccable.  I like their oversaturated displays – even my friends who are die-hard Apple fans have had to concede that the 4″ AMOLED display on my phone is more vibrant than their iPhone 4 display. And It’s Not Apple.  

As for Google, I can’t exactly remember life before Google Apps.  Even my grocery shopping lists are kept as a Google Doc.  And That’s Not Apple, either.

This personal hangup explains why I did not get an iPad2 the minute I decided I needed a tablet device.  Instead I spent weeks researching available choices: Acer IconiaAsus TransformerMotorola Xoom? … etc.

I ended up convincing myself that the Samsung Galaxy Tablet 10.1″ would be the right choice for me.  This thing looks breathtakingly on paper. It’s the same size and weight as the iPad2 (thinner and lighter by a hair – not a meaningful differentiator), but it’s not made by Apple.  

So I eagerly waited for the device to come available at my neighborhood Best Buy on Friday 6-17-2011.  I ran to the store on Saturday in order to play with one, benchmark my experience against the iPad2, then buy the Samsung tab.  I thought it was a shoo-in.

Instead, I found that the device was stunning in every hardware detail… but (GASP AND ALAS) I liked the iOS experience on the iPad2 far better than the Android Honeycomb 3.1 experience on the Samsung Galaxy Tab.  Honeycomb is a fine OS, but it doesn’t hold up a candle to the usability of iOS 4.  And we’ve all read about the wonderful advances in iOS5, coming soon to an Apple device near you.  So I went home depressed… and ordered an iPad2 on line.

If ever there is a cautionary tale about the fickle nature of brand loyalty, this is it. I really, really wanted to get an Android tablet, made by Samsung.  But in the end, the better product won.

Moral of the story: invest in the user experience.  Make it delight the end users.  It will pay off in the end.

Mobile/online analyst feeds to add to your Google Reader

[tweetmeme source=”chenelaine” only_single=”false” service=”bit.ly”]
The other day I was having a conversation with a team who is working on a mobile app. I started spouting smartphone OS market share statistics and trends, and reproduced these (slightly stale) comScore chart on the whiteboard from memory. (By the way, that’s nothing special – any product person in mobile can reproduce 10 such analyst charts on demand.)


The team asked me where I got this data from and how much it cost. Well, it is free (assuming you don’t pay yourself for staying up to date in your own industry.) Simply add the following feeds to your RSS reader of choice (I use Google), and scan the press releases as they come in. All the analysts put out press releases when they have a report coming out. Additionally the mobile industry numbers are crunched and released every quarter. There is no better way to stay on top of the massive flow of data by sipping it a little at a time with your morning coffee. You will know which smartphone OS is on top, which handset manufacturer is winning, what the US market looks like compared to rest of world, etc. Happy reading!

Open source v. Microsoft

[tweetmeme source=”chenelaine” only_single=”false” service=”bit.ly”]
Lately I found myself in the middle of a discussion with a client about which web platform / architecture to choose for a new SaaS project.

The web app itself is eminently doable on any platform, and is not all that scary from a technical difficulty standpoint.  The client is very much adopting an MVP approach and there is buy-in across the board to tightly control what gets in for V1 so there won’t be huge feature creep.   While scalability is a consideration they believe they will roll it out in a measured pace in the initial months, so it is not necessary to plan for, say, 5 million uniques and 15 million page views in a month – they have no plans to push the traffic while they are in learning mode.  So there is time to learn and adjust once the app is launched.

If there is no development history to the project, everything could have been handled with open source technologies.  Drupal could be used as the content management system for the marketing stuff, Java / Ruby / Python or even php could be used on the server side, and one could use MySql or Postgres for the database.  One never has to worry about exploding server side license fees if one stays away from IIS, .NET, Microsoft SQL server and stuff like that.   Open source platforms are great if you have a pronounced need for speed. There are many reusable open source code libraries one could leverage.   Lastly, all the cool kids want to do Ruby on Rails these days and it is much easier to recruit for a Ruby developer than a C# developer.

Alas, there is actually quite a bit of history that complicates things. First of all, there is a legacy Microsoft SQL database with an existing schema, much of which is applicable to this application, and it would be highly advantageous to be able to migrate it instead of having to redo it all in another database.   So moving away from MS SQL doesn’t seem to be advisable.  Second, and more importantly, this company is a Microsoft shop. The development and operations talent in house are all world-class experts in .NET/C++/C#.  This made the decision process very non-obvious.  Do we choose a hot new platform so we can build it quickly with external resources, only to go through a steep learning curve later when this new work is brought back in house?

This is a head scratcher for me and I am actually not sure what I would do if it was my team.  I think I would lean towards picking the trendy platforms.  I probably would plan on hiring at least one new senior or principal level developer who is highly experienced in the new platform, and retraining those who are able and willing to share custodianship for the new platform.  But it is as much a budgetary and human resources consideration as it is a technical decision.  The best technical decision could be an ill advised business decision in the long run.

What would you do if this was your team?

iPhone and Android news from last week

[tweetmeme source=”chenelaine” only_single=”false” service=”bit.ly”]

Here are some random iPhone and Android news from last week. Enjoy!

iPhone News

iPad News

Android news

Top smartphone articles from last week

[tweetmeme source=”chenelaine” only_single=”false” service=”bit.ly”]

Here are some smart phone articles I read last week. Enjoy!

General

iPhone / iPad

Google/ Android

Windows Mobile

Add to DeliciousAdd to DiggAdd to FaceBookAdd to RedditAdd to StumbleUponTweet this

Smartphone market update – Q4 2009

[tweetmeme source=”chenelaine” only_single=”false” service=”bit.ly”]

Analysts in the mobile space have been putting out copious updates with Q4 2009 data.  Here is a quick roundup.  Since I newly became an iPhone fan I poked a bit deeper for iPhone statistics.

Here are my key takeaways (source: IDC)

  • Mobile devices are selling again. Hallelujah!
  • Global smart phone share is growing at a robust pace. In Q4 325.3 million mobile devices were shipped, of which 54.5 million are smart phones (17% share worldwide).
  • Top 3 vendors for this quarter remain: Nokia (38.2%), RIM (19.6%), Apple  (16%). Nokia came back up after a poor Q3.
  • Motorola is suddenly relevant again with the launch of the Droid and the CLIQ/DEXT (4.4% share)

Add to DeliciousAdd to DiggAdd to FaceBookAdd to RedditAdd to StumbleUponTweet this